Attorneys representing an obstetrician-gynecologist and his medical group are challenging a $28 million verdict awarded to a state Health Department investigator. The defense attorneys plan to attack individual jurors by hauling them back into court and will also accuse the entire panel of prejudice. The case involves a botched surgery that caused a urinary tract problem for the 42-year-old woman. Rene Stutzman, Orlando Sentinel 06/26/2006 Read Article: Orlando Sentinel Thursday, June 29, 2006
It might be your civic duty, but insurance lawyers will make it your hell: Insurance Attorneys Use Aggressive Tactic to Challenge Med Mal Verdict
Attorneys representing an obstetrician-gynecologist and his medical group are challenging a $28 million verdict awarded to a state Health Department investigator. The defense attorneys plan to attack individual jurors by hauling them back into court and will also accuse the entire panel of prejudice. The case involves a botched surgery that caused a urinary tract problem for the 42-year-old woman. Rene Stutzman, Orlando Sentinel 06/26/2006 Read Article: Orlando Sentinel 
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment